396 9.2  Systems Biology and Biophysics: “Systems Biophysics”

A key question that systems biology has tried to address is, “what is the correct level of

abstraction at which to understand biology?” Reductionist approaches argue that we should

be able to understand all biology from a knowledge simply of the molecules present. In a

sense, this is quite obviously correct, though equally naïve, since it is not just the molecules

that are important but how they interact, the order in which they interact, and the gener­

ating of higher order features from these interactions that can in turn feedback to the level

of interaction with single molecules. In other words, a more integrationist approach is valu­

able, and physical scientists know this well from observing emergent behavior in many non­

biological systems, complex higher length scale behavior that is difficult or impossible to

predict from a simple knowledge of just the raw composition of a system that can result from

the cooperativity between multiple shorter length scale elements that potentially obey rela­

tively simple rules of interaction. As to where to draw the line in terms of what is the most

appropriate level of abstraction from which to understand biology, this is still a matter of

great debate.

KEY POINT 9.1

Many biologists treat the cell as the best level of abstraction from which to understand

biology, though some suggest that smaller length scales, even to the level of single genes

and beyond in just single sections of genes, are a more appropriated level. However,

feedback clearly occurs across multiple length scales in a biological organism, and in

fact in many cases between organisms and even between populations of organisms. So,

the question of where exactly to draw the line presents a challenge.

Modern systems biology has now adopted a core computational biology emphasis,

resulting in the development of powerful new mathematical methodologies for modeling

complex biosystems by often adapting valuable algorithms from the field of systems engin­

eering. However, it is only comparatively recently that these have been coupled to robust bio­

physical tools and techniques to facilitate the acquisition of far more accurate biomolecular

and physiological parameters that are inputted into these models. Arguably, the biggest

challenge the modern systems biology field set itself was in matching the often exquisite

quality of the modeling approaches with the more challenging quality of the data input, since

without having confidence in both any predictions of emergent behavior stemming from

the models may be flawed. In this section, we discuss some of the key engineering modeling

concepts applied to modeling interactions of components in an extended biological system,

and of their coupling with modern biophysical methods, to generate a new field of systems

biophysics.

9.2.1  CELLULAR BIOPHYSICS

The founding of systems biophysics really goes back to the early work of Hodgkin and Huxley

on the squid axon (see Chapter 1), which can also be seen as the first real example of a

methodical cellular biophysics investigation, which coupled biophysical experimental tools

in the form of time-​resolved electrical measurements on extracted squid nerve cells, with a

mathematical modeling approach that incorporated several coupled differential equations to

characterize the propagation of the electrical impulse along the nerve cell. A key result in this

modeling is the establishment of feedback loops between different components in the system.

Such feedback loops are a general feature of systems biology and facilitate systems regulation.

For example, in the case of electrical nerve impulse propagation in the squid axon, proteins

that form the ion channels in the cell membrane of the axon generate electric current through

ion flux that either charges or discharges the electrical capacitance of that cell, which alters

the electrical potential across the cell membrane. But similarly, the electrical potential across

the cell membrane itself also controls the gating of the ion channel proteins.